Instructions to use Elda-AI/intenter with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use Elda-AI/intenter with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("token-classification", model="Elda-AI/intenter")# Load model directly from transformers import AutoModel model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("Elda-AI/intenter", device_map="auto") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
Access to Intenter
Intenter is released for research, evaluation, internal validation and education. Tell us who you are and we will grant access.
By requesting access you agree to the Elda Community License 1.0: no commercial use, no redistribution of the weights or derivatives, and attribution as "Built with Elda". Commercial licensing is available on request.
Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this model content.
Elda-Intenter — real-time speech-act + entity extraction in a single pass
Korean-first, multilingual (ko · ja · en). 281M parameters · p50 27.8 ms.
One forward pass returns four aligned channels: what the speaker is doing (speech act), what they are talking about (entities), and the attribute/predicate structure binding them. Not a general-purpose NER model — the perception layer of a live conversational system.
"간판의 품격이라는 음식점이 있다며, 그 음식점은 어디에 있냐고"
intent QUESTION
entity 간판의 품격 → ORGANIZATION
음식점이 → ORGANIZATION
signals is_pure_negation=0 · is_claim=0 · polarity=0 · depends_on_prev=1
Results
All sets below are excluded from training by construction.
MASSIVE (dev, re-annotated) — conversational speech, same five peers
Voice-assistant utterances, our actual traffic shape. Same axes, same particle rule; peers emit
KLUE's six types, so only the shared axes are comparable and type is omitted.
| abstention ↓ | span recall | boundary | precision | anchor reach | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ko ours (469 sent.) | 2.7 | 97.3 | 96.5 | 96.6 | 81.8 |
| ko — 5 peers | 33.7 – 67.9 | 32.1 – 66.3 | 69.9 – 86.4 | 89.4 – 94.7 | 6.6 – 72.7 |
| ja ours (749 sent.) | 2.7 | 97.3 | 97.7 | 95.0 | 91.3 |
| ja — 5 peers | 30.1 – 76.2 | 23.8 – 69.9 | 50.8 – 84.0 | 72.3 – 93.9 | 18.8 – 48.0 |
| en ours (796 sent.) | 2.9 | 97.1 | 92.6 | 82.1 | 95.2 |
| en — 5 peers | 38.6 – 69.4 | 30.6 – 61.4 | 12.5 – 63.3 | 90.7 – 94.8 | 28.5 – 64.0 |
We lead every axis on ko and ja, and all but precision on en. Entity F1 under our own scorer:
ja 79.7 · ko 85.5 · en 74.5 (one trailing function word allowed).
Not comparable to published MASSIVE scores: that benchmark is intent classification plus slot filling with 55 slot types. We map 21 onto 11 of our entity types; peers are KLUE-NER models run outside their training domain. Zero training overlap on dev is verified by the evaluator.
KLUE-NER (dev · 600 sentences / 1,687 gold), entity-level F1
| entity F1 | boundary F1 | |
|---|---|---|
| exact match | 55.3 | 57.9 |
| allowing one trailing Korean particle | 63.9 | 66.9 |
Korean particles attach to the noun. The second row accepts one trailing particle when the start offset matches — spans are never trimmed.
KLUE-NER — the same five peers, on their own training domain
Every peer is a dedicated KLUE-NER model fine-tuned on all 21,008 KLUE-NER training sentences, emitting exactly KLUE's six types. We saw 2,500 of them, emit 17 types projected onto those six, and run four channels plus six auxiliary heads in the same pass.
| axis | ours | KF-DeBERTa | KLUE-BERT | RoBERTa-large | KoELECTRA | RoBERTa-base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| type accuracy | 88.2 | 98.2 | 97.7 | 98.1 | 95.1 | 92.2 |
| abstention (lower better) | 14.0 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 13.6 | 18.3 | 41.1 |
| span recall | 86.0 | 98.0 | 97.6 | 86.4 | 81.7 | 58.9 |
| boundary | 97.2 | 97.3 | 96.2 | 96.2 | 91.9 | 62.9 |
| precision | 89.6 | 97.2 | 97.4 | 98.0 | 96.0 | 96.7 |
| anchor reach | 79.2 | 94.8 | 94.6 | 69.8 | 54.8 | 13.0 |
We lose on every axis; boundary is a tie. Third or fourth of six. Note the peer spread —
anchor reach runs 13.0 to 94.8, so a single-peer table could have been picked to favour us.
Axes. abstention — nothing emitted at a gold position. span recall — something emitted
there. boundary — returned span contains the gold string. precision — emitted spans landing
on gold, over spans carrying a KLUE-mappable type (1,427/1,592); over all our spans it is 78.9,
since 165 carry types KLUE does not annotate (WORK, ARTIFACTS, TERM, EVENT, DURATION).
anchor reach — span returned under a type that opens a downstream lookup (LOCATION /
ORGANIZATION; 447 of 1,687 gold here).
Our training mix is 4.0 % news. KLUE-NER is news text; our material is wiki, conversational Korean and synthetic templates. Whether these peers hold up on conversational Korean is untested here.
Reported by others, on their own runs — not our ruler, not verified by us: KLUE-RoBERTa-large 90.8 · XLM-R-large 85.9 · KR-BERT-base 77.2 · mBERT-base 73.2 (KLUE paper). Our re-scoring of a KLUE-NER RoBERTa-large on this split gave 83.4, not 90.8.
Frozen internal gates
Re-run on every build, evaluated per surface, not summed.
| Role nouns — detection / typing (405 slots) | 401 / 399 |
| Referent expressions, held out | 23 · 23 · 22 |
| Conversational-speech detection / safety floor | 92.4 % · 12 / 12 |
| Possessive structure — owner kept (40 surfaces) | 31 / 40 |
| Discourse signals — false positives on short utterances | 1 / 48 |
| Discourse signals — polarity grid | 23 / 24 |
| Formal-register interrogatives | 13 / 14 |
| Proper-name span probe, third-party frames (80 slots) | 78 / 80 |
| Name-span probe, third-party (698 slots) | 685 / 698 |
| Span-convention compliance (126 slots) | 126 / 126 |
The two third-party probe rows are produced by a separate team on their own infrastructure.
Why an encoder
| Elda-Intenter | typical small-LLM extraction | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 281M | 500M – 4B |
| Latency (single, incl. heads) | p50 27.8 ms | hundreds of ms |
| Latency (batch of 16) | 118.5 ms | seconds |
| Serving precision | fp32 (2 workers, 6.1 GB GPU) | varies |
| Output | fixed contract, char offsets | free text to be parsed |
Measured on the production serving path (RTX 3060, fp32, heads attached). Span extraction is classification over token pairs, and a bidirectional encoder sees the whole utterance at once.
Output contract
Four Global Pointer channels over one shared mDeBERTa-v3-base backbone, plus binary signal heads and one span-attribute head. All channels are character spans over the original string.
| channel | what it carries |
|---|---|
intents |
speech act over the utterance or clause — 18 types incl. AGREE / DISAGREE / QUESTION / COMMAND / NARRATE / DESCRIBE / REQUEST |
entities |
17 entity types × subtypes, plus about_speaker per span |
attributes |
modifiers bound to an entity |
predicates |
what is asserted of it |
signals |
four binary discourse signals, plus two three-valued judgements, each with probabilities |
about_speaker is true / false / null (null = abstains). signals also carries place_q
("did the speaker point at one specific place or business?") and needs_map ("must something
outside the model be consulted to answer?"), each "yes" / "no" / null with a probability.
No threshold is applied to any of them — label and probability are both emitted and the cut is
the consumer's. See ABOUT_SPEAKER_OUTPUT_CONTRACT.md and SIGNALS_JUDGE_OUTPUT_CONTRACT.md.
Spans may nest (「제 친구」 and 「친구」). Key by span offsets, not by surface.
Usage
No from_pretrained one-liner — custom four-channel span architecture.
import json, sys
from pathlib import Path
d = Path("path/to/this/repo")
sys.path.insert(0, str(d))
import modeling_btrack_4ch_w4 as M
m = M.load(str(d), "cuda") # base + 5 gap-fill heads + about_speaker + W4 + 2 judge heads
print(json.dumps(M.infer(m, "판교 카카오 본사 어디야"), ensure_ascii=False, indent=1))
# model.safetensors carries the same weights in the same dtype, if you prefer it:
# from safetensors.torch import load_file
# m.load_state_dict(load_file(d / "model.safetensors"))
backbone_config.json is included — the repository is self-contained. md5sum -c MD5SUMS
verifies a download in full; model.pt is bit-identical to the file answering live traffic.
Serve in fp32 (weights stored bf16). INT8 collapses this model — measured.
Limitations
- Korean first. ja and en are supported and measured; Korean gets the curated material.
- Not a general NER model. Type inventory and span scope come from a conversational product.
- Korean particles. Spans carry the particle; we do not trim. Match with one trailing particle allowed, or strip on your side.
- Weak on news text. Our training mix is 4.0 % news.
is_pure_negationhas false positives no threshold recovers (8 fp / 8 fn on 3,193 rows at τ=0.7). A soft signal, not a filter.- Boundaries, not senses. Entity linking is a separate layer, not in this repository.
This repository
Build 0da2d001 / config 2f67efa4 — the weights answering production traffic. Refreshed roughly
monthly. Two output contracts ship alongside the weights
(ABOUT_SPEAKER_OUTPUT_CONTRACT.md, SIGNALS_JUDGE_OUTPUT_CONTRACT.md).
Attribution — third-party training data
Parts of the training corpus are adapted from publicly licensed datasets. Their licenses apply to those parts and are reproduced here.
KLUE — KLUE: Korean Language Understanding Evaluation, Park et al., 2021. Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Source: https://github.com/KLUE-benchmark/KLUE · paper: arXiv:2105.09680.
Changes we made (this is an adaptation, not a copy). 2,500 sentences from the KLUE-NER training split were re-annotated under our own span convention and type inventory: KLUE's six entity types were mapped onto our seventeen, sentences longer than four eojeol were dropped, single-character entities were dropped, and sentences overlapping our held-out probes were removed. Intent, attribute and predicate channels carry no KLUE labels and are masked out during training. The dev split is used for evaluation only and appears nowhere in training — the evaluator verifies this and refuses to run otherwise.
MASSIVE — MASSIVE: A 1M-Example Multilingual Natural Language Understanding Dataset, FitzGerald et al., Amazon Science. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: https://github.com/alexa/massive.
Changes we made. Korean and Japanese rows were re-annotated under our span convention; 21 of MASSIVE's 55 slot types were mapped onto 11 of our entity types. MASSIVE's intent labels are not used — that channel is masked out per source. Dev rows used for evaluation are excluded from training by construction.
Everything else in the corpus is our own work. Training data and evaluation sets are not distributed with this repository.
License & access
Released under the Elda Community License 1.0 (see LICENSE).
- ✅ Research, evaluation, internal validation, education — free of charge
- ✳ Attribution: "Built with Elda"
- ⛔ Commercial use and redistribution require a separate agreement
Access is gated: tell us who you are and access is granted automatically. Training data and evaluation sets are not distributed.
Citation
@software{intenter2026,
title = {Elda-Intenter: real-time multilingual speech-act and entity extraction},
author = {Elda AI},
year = {2026},
url = {https://huggingface.co/Elda-AI/intenter}
}
- Downloads last month
- -