Instructions to use metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-risk-and-resilience with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- PEFT
How to use metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-risk-and-resilience with PEFT:
from peft import PeftModel from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B") model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base_model, "metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-risk-and-resilience") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
Manifest Specialist — Risk & Resilience
A specialized supply-chain domain-expert — focused entirely on risk & resilience.
Manifest Risk & Resilience is a domain-expert in the Manifest family: where the general Manifest orchestrator models cover all of supply chain, this one is tuned specifically for supply-chain risk and resilience — disruption, supplier failure, monitoring, mitigation, and continuity.
- Family: Manifest · Type: domain-expert (specialized) · Size: 2B
- Specialty: supply-chain risk & resilience
Preferred 72.5% of the time over the base model
On a focused 20-question risk benchmark, an independent LLM judge panel preferred Manifest Risk & Resilience's answer over the base model's 72.5% of the time (14 wins / 5 losses / 1 tie).
Best for
Risk and resilience questions where a focused, practitioner's answer beats a generic one:
- Disruption response, supplier-failure and continuity planning
- Risk monitoring, early-warning and alerting design
- Resilience trade-offs (buffers, dual-sourcing, network redundancy)
See the difference
Same question. Base model vs Manifest Risk & Resilience.
Ask: "What is the failure mode known as alert fatigue in supply-chain risk monitoring, and how can data analytics mitigate it?"
Base model → "### Failure Mode: Alert Fatigue. Alert fatigue is a critical failure mode where the volume, frequency, or complexity of alerts…" — a generic textbook definition.
Manifest Risk & Resilience → "Alert fatigue is the state where an organization receives too many, unfiltered risk alerts, so it stops paying attention to the real ones and misses the ones it never saw — a failure of signal-to-noise management, not a lack of data…" — sharp, practitioner framing.
The Manifest family
Two kinds of models:
🧠Orchestrators — general-purpose, handle any supply-chain area
| Model | Size | Preferred over base | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manifest 0.8B | 0.8B | 68.5% | ✅ available |
| Manifest 2B | 2B | 88.4% | ✅ available |
| Manifest 4B | 4B | 90.9% | ✅ available |
🎯 Domain-experts — specialized for a single area
| Model | Preferred over base | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Manifest Specialist · Risk & Resilience | 72.5% | ✅ available |
| Manifest Specialist · Inventory Optimization | 77.5% | ✅ available |
| Manifest Specialist · Demand Planning | 82.5% | ✅ available |
Orchestrators are scored on the general supply-chain benchmark; domain-experts on their focused domain benchmark.
How to use
Manifest Risk & Resilience is a LoRA adapter (~44 MB), applied on top of its base model at load time.
from peft import PeftModel
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
base = "Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B" # base model — see "Built on" below
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(base)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(base, device_map="auto")
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(model, "metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-risk-and-resilience")
SYSTEM = "You are a senior supply chain expert. Answer correctly and concisely."
msgs = [{"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM},
{"role": "user", "content": "A strategic supplier just failed an audit. Walk me through the risk response."}]
inputs = tok.apply_chat_template(msgs, add_generation_prompt=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt")
out = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=512, temperature=0.7)
print(tok.decode(out[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
Prompt tip: include the asker's role and operating scale (revenue, SKUs, suppliers, nodes, lead time) for the sharpest answers.
Training details
| Method | LoRA (PEFT 0.20.0), rank 16 / alpha 16 / dropout 0.05 |
| Target modules | all attention + MLP projections |
| Trainable params | 10,911,744 (~0.9% of the 1.21B base) |
| Epochs | 3 |
| Final loss | 1.82 |
The training data is a focused, proprietary supply-chain risk dataset and is not open-sourced — only the held-out evaluation benchmark (supply-chain-eval) is public.
Evaluation
Scored on a focused 20-question risk benchmark — pairwise LLM-as-judge (2-model panel), Manifest's answer vs the base model's for the same prompt.
| Comparison | Win-rate | W / L / T |
|---|---|---|
| Manifest Risk & Resilience vs base | 70.0% | 13 / 5 / 2 |
| Manifest Risk & Resilience vs base + format | 72.5% | 14 / 5 / 1 |
Benchmark: supply-chain-eval (risk split). This is an early, focused benchmark — the sample is small, so treat it as directional.
Intended use & limitations
- Intended use: decision-support and drafting for supply-chain risk & resilience questions.
- Out of scope: not legally binding, contractual, or safety-critical guidance; no access to your live systems. Verify outputs before acting.
- Limitations: English-only; specialized to risk (use a Manifest orchestrator for general questions); trained on synthetic data; standard LLM risks apply.
License
Released under CC-BY-NC-4.0 — free for research and non-commercial use, with attribution. Commercial use requires a license from MetaFloor — get in touch at metafloor.ai.
Built on
Manifest Risk & Resilience is a LoRA adapter over Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B (used under its own license); the base model is required to load the adapter.
Citation
@misc{metafloor_manifest_risk_2b,
title = {Manifest Risk & Resilience: a supply-chain risk domain-expert (MetaFloor Manifest family)},
author = {MetaFloor AI},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-risk-and-resilience}}
}
- Downloads last month
- 9
Model tree for metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-risk-and-resilience
Collection including metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-risk-and-resilience
Evaluation results
- Preferred over base model by independent LLM judge panel on supply-chain-eval (risk)self-reported0.725